gregbo (gregbo) wrote,

  • Mood:

Google vs. the click fraud detectors

Google recently posted a criticism of some of the third-party click fraud detection companies, claiming their methodologies were incorrect cause their click fraud numbers to be inflated. At a recent Search Engine Strategies panel, the findings were debated.

I'm inclined to believe Google on this one, having seen more than my share of conflicting measurement studies. The CF detection companies did mistakenly classify back clicks on a browser to a landing page as click fraud, among other things (assuming these clicks weren't faked). However, this doesn't mean the amount of actual click fraud isn't at least as much as the CF detection companies are reporting. In addition, Google offered as defense "our logs say differently" (without actually offering their logs as evidence, not that we should necessarily believe them).

I was checking ClickForensics, one of the CF detection companies, and noticed that they have commissioned the 'tute to do an econometric study of the likelihood of click fraud occurring based on ad spending. While this is certainly important, I think there needs to be an equal focus on the actual weaknesses in CPC (and other per-web activity) models that enable click fraud to occur. As I mentioned before, not enough attention is paid to analogous models, such as phone fraud.

In any event, I filled out their contact form asking for more information. The last time I asked ClickForensics for information, I never heard anything from them. This time, I indicated in the comments that I am an MIT graduate, in addition to describing my AltaVista work. Hopefully they'll respond. I'm disappointed at how closed this community has been so far (for arguably good reasons, lest fraudsters figure out what they're doing). I wish it could be more like the IETF which is open to anyone.
Tags: click fraud

  • Ciena interview

    I had an onsite interview at Ciena a couple of weeks ago for a Senior Systems Test position. Long story short — I didn't get the job. I think they…

  • ProtonMail test

    I took a test from 7-9am this morning from ProtonMail, a secure email provider based in Geneva, Switzerland, that has an office in SF. The test was…

  • IBM interview

    I had an interview loop yesterday at the IBM Silicon Valley Lab facility with several people from the Cloud Network Services group. Four engineers…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.