October 13th, 2007

classic cylon

being a consultant

Here is a link to Noel Chiappa's website. Noel Chiappa is a networking consultant. I first met him back in 1982, when I joined MIT-LCS. I would like to be as good as he is. Maybe not exactly as good, but in the same ballpark. I'd at least like to be in the same class as him, if people were looking for someone to do something. I'm not in the same class as he is now, because (among other reasons), I haven't done networking continuously, as he has. Hopefully I will get better, but I have to put serious time into doing so, and can't be distracted by things like arguing about why unique cookies shouldn't be used to estimate the size of the web site's user base.

It's like in music, if you know you need to practice more to reach a certain goal. There are pieces I've worked on for a while, and I've memorized them, but do not play them consistently well. With more practice, I will. If I were trying to get hired to play in public, I wouldn't expect to be, because I don't play these pieces as well as other people who are paid to play. I don't see anything wrong with admitting this; it is not wrong to regularly assess one's progress in working towards a goal. The amount charged for services (whether they be musical or technical) is orthogonal to the issue of competence. I hope this makes sense.

A dilemma here is if the marketplace is not strong enough for someone to live off consultant's wages, but there are plenty of (low paying) jobs that require something like obtaining the unique number of cookies. If someone is forced into that role (after difficulty landing such a job, because the criteria for hiring are different), s/he may not be able to keep up "consultant chops" sufficient to get one of the consulting gigs when it comes around. I think part of the problem I have is that it is very difficult to explain this aspect of the computer field to people who aren't in it. People seem to think that one is always as good at something as they ever were, or that they will always be evaluated as such by prospective employers. So they are amazed and puzzled about how difficult it has been for me to find a job. In effect, computer professionals might very well "starve for their art" just like musicians.
classic cylon

Elwell v. Google, Inc.

This is another lawsuit filed against Google, this time by Christina Elwell who claims discrimination. A disquieting aspect of this suit is that over the course of the incidents that prompted the lawsuit, she miscarried, losing three of her children. The case has gone to arbitration, as per a court ruling that the employee agreement Ms. Elwell signed requires such disputes to be settled by an arbiter.

I think it is reasonable to assume that people who might otherwise want to work at Google might have second thoughts after hearing about this. Other companies seem to have figured it out, with regards to HR policies, and are still able to be profitable while allowing their employees to be creative and productive. I attribute this sort of thing to the "inexperienced management" discussed in the court proceedings of Reid v. Google, Inc. A company that wants to manage the world's information should invest some time and money to train its HR managers in industry-accepted HR policy, IMO. Such training will aid them in attracting and retaining a world-class workforce. I wonder how many people have decided not to work for Google, at a time when they are asking the US Congress to grant more visas, because they can't find enough people?

In case you're interested, commentary from Rocky Lewis, a pregnant (at the time) business owner of SageRock.com, an Internet marketing company.
  • Current Mood
    annoyed annoyed