busyI've used Cuil a bit, and let's face it, they're not ready yet. Leaving aside the quality of their search results for now, when you can't even get a search result because you get results unavailable messages back from them, you've got real problems. Some feel that they launched too soon, and that people won't bother coming back because, let's face it, there are better alternatives. Perhaps all this buzz will get people to come back, but Cuil better be ready. You don't get too many second chances in the search biz.
Should they even get to the point where they are a viable competitor to Google (for a user audience), I wonder if the founders (or their investors) will permit the company to stay independent. Arguably, Powerset has a newer, conceptually improved (according to some search experts) means of indexing and ranking content, but they were sold to M$ for $100 million. We'll never know what might have happened if they'd held out, but in this economic environment, who can pass up an opportunity for that much money (if they don't already have that kind of money)?
Getting back to the subject of Cuil's query load, I remember reading that the late Paul Flaherty of AV told Google's founders, when they approached AV to buy its technology, that if they wanted to go it alone, they needed to find some way to support the query load, especially if it was bots trying to take down their site. Cuil needs to be aware of this, as bots are far more prolific now than they were ten years ago. Even script kiddies can easily and cheaply get their hands on technologies that can take down a new site.
