gregbo (gregbo) wrote,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

The YouTube dilemma

Lauren Weinstein writes a thoughtful piece in his blog about how YouTube videos bring us pain and delight. The delight is obvious: there's all sorts of stuff you can find there; too numerous to mention. I'll just make a short plug for something I recently viewed, which you probably wouldn't have heard or seen much on commercial media when it was released, and would have a much harder time finding on any commercial outlet now. But this, and lots of other stuff I like to watch, is available on YouTube, but not many other places:

The pain, however, is that a lot of YouTube content has been pirated. YouTube is being sued by Viacom for copyright infringement. Unlike other lawsuits, such as click fraud, Viacom is a major industry player with at least as much financial resources as YouTube to stage a court fight. They know who to talk to about the limitations of certain types of infringement detecting software, and they have a sense of what content is likely to be pirated. (I suspect that as smart as the YouTube engineers are, they don't spend a lot of time actively scanning for copyrighted content, and even if they do, they couldn't possibly know everything that is out there in the long tail.) So this lawsuit isn't going to go away. It's going to get ugly because both sides have their heels dug in.

To tie this in with the situation currently befalling Yahoo!, they have videos available for view, one can make one's own playlists, etc. While they have nowhere close to the depth and breadth of offerings that YouTube has, one advantage they do have is that their video and audio quality is generally better. Also, they've obtained the rights to all of their videos. So people who come to their video site can be assured that their favorite videos aren't going to vanish because someone pulled them for copyright infringement. This could be a selling point for Y! over YT, in that they can say although we don't have everything YT does, what we do have will always be around. By encouraging people to come to the site and patronizing the advertisers, they can afford to get more of that not-so-commercial long tail content in HQ and with all viewing rights. But this strategy depends on whether or not people are more interested in reliability than (potential) access to a broad swath of content.
Tags: dmca

  • Ciena interview

    I had an onsite interview at Ciena a couple of weeks ago for a Senior Systems Test position. Long story short — I didn't get the job. I think they…

  • ProtonMail test

    I took a test from 7-9am this morning from ProtonMail, a secure email provider based in Geneva, Switzerland, that has an office in SF. The test was…

  • IBM interview

    I had an interview loop yesterday at the IBM Silicon Valley Lab facility with several people from the Cloud Network Services group. Four engineers…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.