?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The blogosphere has been abuzz lately with discussion of Google's release of the methods they use to determine which clicks are "invalid".

There has been other commentary from Matt Cutts and Shuman Ghosemajumder (who was a Sloanie, btw). The latter contains a key admission, something not explicitly stated by Google before (at least from what I've heard and seen):

"So what is our overall "click fraud rate"? As noted in the diagram in the story, it is virtually impossible to know the intent of every click. However, we can do a very effective job using statistical techniques to detect potentially malicious behavior, and the total number of invalid clicks we detect – whether for suspected malicious or non-malicious intent – is in the single digit percentages. So third-party estimates which say that click fraud is 15% or higher appear to clearly be substantial exaggerations."

While this statement is plausible on the surface, it still underscores that the actual amount of click fraud is still unknown, and will continue to be when the determination is made using logs, clickstreams, etc.

Comments

( 1 comment — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous)
Feb. 16th, 2007 09:27 am (UTC)
Keep up the outstanding work and thank you
Keep it UP. excellent site i really like your stuff.
( 1 comment — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2017
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow